Cervical Cancer Ultrasound – Cervical cancer is a very widespread but easy to prevent form of cancer found in women. As with all cancers and early diagnosis can be vital. In recent year the death rate associated with this cancer has plummeted. This is mainly due to the increased awareness on the significance of regular screening through Pap tests. These tests can immediately detect precancerous lesions diagnosed as dysplasia which are 100% curable. Even if diagnosed as cancer, if it is in its early stages it can be easily managed with surgery. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy can be resorted to in later stages of development use crystal x & sabun gove.
The first step in ensuring an effective treatment is evaluating the extent of the disease and there are specialized pretherapeutic procedures for doing that. Early cervical cancer is asymptomatic and almost 20% of patients diagnosed with cancer have never had any warning signs.
Ultrasound scans are a method used to stage cervical cancer, as devices part of the biopsy procedure essential in accurately diagnosing the cancer. Staging the cancer is vital. The pretreatment evaluation of patients with cervical cancer includes chest x-rays, intravenous urography and physical examination but also cross sectional imaging (CT or MRI). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a much better soft-tissue contrast resolution than computed tomography(CT) or ultrasound procedures
(US-ultrasonography). Though ultrasound is also useful, an MRI is more effective and accurate in assessing the size and extent of the tumor, but also the degree of invasiveness and the exact determination of the area affected by the cancerous formations. Actually both MRI and CT scanning are superior to ultrasound in what concerns the detection of swollen lymph nodes.
US is not the first choice for staging the full extent of the invasiveness of the cancer. This particular procedure does not accurately detect all the potential sites of metastasis and also does not depict the areas of the body which contain lymph nodes. So there are significantly more limitations to ultrasound screening.
Another disadvantage is also the fact that US depends a whole deal on the operator. The quality of the image is worsened by a large body habitus and visualization of parts of the pelvis and abdomen can be interfered with by bowel gas and bony structures and other irrelevant factors.
The transabdominal ultrasound is also a procedure to be considered but it can also be affected by the degree of bladder filling and surgical lesions present on the body. This procedure implies a high degree of inaccuracy risk and it is best used as a complimentary testing procedure.
There’s also the option for a transvaginal ultrasound which is more frequently done but also implies certain limitations among which a small field of view. This also applies to the transrectal ultrasound. Not to mention that many patients present certain intolerance to the transvaginal or transrectal approach.